Brominated food and drink cause an iodine deficiency! It is a toxic man made chemical in our bread, drinks and environment! We are being slowly murdered, and so are our children!
Iodine and Cancer?! Incredible Information
Breast, ovary...cancers and Iodine...Research...From my blog here learn I put regular iodine from the kind put on a sore directly on the outside of my neck. My body will absorb this...Amazing what I learned here. Will find out more for the blog!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILtiPYu3tYA&feature=player_detailpag
Find the food you need to eat while this happening, Take care of yourself and those you love.
From my first email Radiation Fallout protection, I got a few chemistry-related criticisms objecting to my stating that iodine was a rock mineral when it is an element. The objectors are not incorrect as far as it goes. We are grossly mi...seducated about chemistry because the chemistry industry must make itself respectable and profitable. Who do you think makes decisions about what books are used in schools? It will always be the people who believe what they are told and fall in line with the industrial class that rule the world rather than those who challenge and criticize skewed science.
Notice that chemistry wants you to believe in absolutes so that they can claim safety. However, if we evaluate the so-called simple chemistry of iodine, we will be confronted with many contradictions which have convoluted chemical explanations that don't make sense.
Take for example iodine 131. It is said to have an 8-day half life and complete dissolution in 40 days. However, there are always byproducts of either liquid, gas, solid or combinations of all three that occur with decay. The byproducts of decayed iodine can be more dangerous than non-decayed iodine. The medical and nuclear industry will deny that but it is a fact. Take for example a bottle of iodine used for antiseptic purposes. If it is said to be completely decayed and ineffective after 40 days, it should have no reaction after 40 days. However, if you take a bottle that has been opened several times and is 2 years old, it will have a stronger antiseptic effect than a fresh one. Often, it will be so caustic that it will cause rashes after some usage.
Therefore, I do not believe much of what academic chemistry teaches because it is so biased to protect polluting industries. Those industries break elements and minerals down into tables that you can see and that give you the sense that they can be directed and controlled. For example, this was written about my first email on this subject:
”…the amount of radiation from a given isotope during its half-life is roughly proportional to the amount of that isotope divided by its atomic weight. Thus a pound of iodine 131 with a half life of 8.04 days is far more radioactive [by a factor of 1440] than cesium 137 with a half life of 33 years, (33*365*131/(8*137) =1440) The good news is that in 80 days, 99.9% of the iodine will be gone!”
Another comment from someone who works for a major nuclear energy provider:
"It’s very simple. All atoms and molecules interact chemically using their electron shells. Whether acid on zinc, chemical reactions in the body or burning wood; all these reactions start with some number atoms and the same atoms are on the other side of the reaction, no atoms are made or destroyed. Nuclear reactions occur in the nucleus and nuclear reactions can result in new, combined or different atoms. Atoms are radioactive because their NUCLEUS is unstable. For example tritium is a Hydrogen atom with an extra neutron in the nucleus. Tritium decays by ejecting a beta particle (a high speed electron) from one neutron converting the atom into Helium. Therefore, the idea that “oranges and avocados eaten together help neutralize radiation” is pure fantasy because these chemicals can have no effect on radiation emitted from the nucleus of other atoms."
I am living proof that that conclusion is untrue and the fantasy is that chemists have everything understood, categorized and under control. If they did, we would not have suffered Three-mile Island, Chernobyl or Fukushima aftermaths. The variables from person to person or animal to animal are extraordinary, so much so that no one can erect a chart for it as they do their elements and minerals. I reiterate, chemists are trained with blindfolds, biases and prejudices that do not allow for practical and rational variations. The idea that chemical reactions are fixed and controllable is the big fantasy of those postulating and profiting from nuclear, chemical, food, fabricated products and pharma/medical and all related industries.
Since I was the victim of cancers caused by radiation treatments and worked with at least a hundred who also suffered radiation treatments and found that eating oranges and avocados together lessened the symptoms of radiation-poisoning time after time, especially nausea and burn, I had to conclude that it helped remove radiation from the body. It is true that it may have only ameliorated the symptoms however, when taken regularly, radiation symptoms eased dramatically.
Since I experienced those high doses of injected iodine immediately preceding radiation treatments 43 years ago and still have occasions, averaging once yearly, of intense radiation nausea and iodine-taste, I must conclude that the radioactively charged iodine has a much longer life than physics books explain. Every time I go through it, I experience the very pain I had for 2 years following the treatments. My latest episode lasted only 36 hours but was as painful as 42-43 years ago. Each time I have an episode, the episode duration reduces. When I vomited during those spells, tests of the vomit showed high doses of iodine (non-decayed), as well as barium as recently as 6 years ago. Since, it was always the same, I stopped having my vomit tested. Atomic charts are not accurate when biochemistry is involved and may not be when biochemistry is not involved.
A nuclear physicist told me that in animals' the HALF-LIFE of a nuclear-charged isotope can have many times more years than normal. She is purported to be expert on bio-nuclear physics. She gave a half life of radioactively charged iodine up to 25,000 years in cases of entombed animals. I know nothing about nuclear physics and have never been in a nuclear laboratory.
I think that the half-life measure is not so intelligent but that may be a lack in my intelligence. Why not just give the total years? Is it because the last half-life is much longer than the first half-life, five times longer? Is that a physicist's way of making the life of radioactive isotopes seem less threatening or harmful? And rarely is there any mention of decayed isotopes’ byproducts and how lethal or disease-producing they are.See More
I think that the half-life measure is not so intelligent but that may be a lack in my intelligence. Why not just give the total years? Is it because the last half-life is much longer than the first half-life, five times longer? Is that a ph...ysicist's way of making the life of radioactive isotopes seem less threatening or harmful? And rarely is there any mention of decayed isotopes’ byproducts and how lethal or disease-producing they are.
Four years ago, I was conducting private consults in a USA city. My first day was filled with people who had been successful on my diet for 2-6 years. Eight of them showed high levels of supplemental iodine stored in their bodies in various areas that had not been there in previous years. Also, mostly the iodine was not stored in the thyroid but intestines and nervous systems. On the second day, the first 3 clients were also longterm Primal Dieters. They too had large amounts of supplemental iodine stored in their bodies, only one had it in her thyroid.
Finally, I asked if there was a iodine-manufacturer near who had an accident. His response was, "Frank used his pendulum with all of us and suggested that we take his liquid iodine supplement that would vastly improve our health." Was taking dosages that were way beyond their bodies' capability to utilize common sense? Was trusting a pendulum a smart practice? To the point, of the 11 people who were taking supplemental iodine, only one had indications that it stored in her thyroid.
Who has proved in test after test that bodies tend to store it in the thyroid? Could it be utter nonsense produced by manufacturers of iodine who jump on the radiation bandwagon for profit, and politicians who want to give people some kind of false sense of security? The only tests I have read were done or paid for by the nuclear industry who has nothing but vested interest in nuclear industry." UNKNOWN AUTHOR...
https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.usher1?ref=tn_tnmn#!/notes/kimberly-usher/first-rate-info-on-radiation/193983407312034
Iodine and Cancer?! Incredible Information
Breast, ovary...cancers and Iodine...Research...From my blog here learn I put regular iodine from the kind put on a sore directly on the outside of my neck. My body will absorb this...Amazing what I learned here. Will find out more for the blog!
Find the food you need to eat while this happening, Take care of yourself and those you love.
 |
| What do you think this is showing? |
From my first email Radiation Fallout protection, I got a few chemistry-related criticisms objecting to my stating that iodine was a rock mineral when it is an element. The objectors are not incorrect as far as it goes. We are grossly mi...seducated about chemistry because the chemistry industry must make itself respectable and profitable. Who do you think makes decisions about what books are used in schools? It will always be the people who believe what they are told and fall in line with the industrial class that rule the world rather than those who challenge and criticize skewed science.
Notice that chemistry wants you to believe in absolutes so that they can claim safety. However, if we evaluate the so-called simple chemistry of iodine, we will be confronted with many contradictions which have convoluted chemical explanations that don't make sense.
Take for example iodine 131. It is said to have an 8-day half life and complete dissolution in 40 days. However, there are always byproducts of either liquid, gas, solid or combinations of all three that occur with decay. The byproducts of decayed iodine can be more dangerous than non-decayed iodine. The medical and nuclear industry will deny that but it is a fact. Take for example a bottle of iodine used for antiseptic purposes. If it is said to be completely decayed and ineffective after 40 days, it should have no reaction after 40 days. However, if you take a bottle that has been opened several times and is 2 years old, it will have a stronger antiseptic effect than a fresh one. Often, it will be so caustic that it will cause rashes after some usage.
Therefore, I do not believe much of what academic chemistry teaches because it is so biased to protect polluting industries. Those industries break elements and minerals down into tables that you can see and that give you the sense that they can be directed and controlled. For example, this was written about my first email on this subject:
”…the amount of radiation from a given isotope during its half-life is roughly proportional to the amount of that isotope divided by its atomic weight. Thus a pound of iodine 131 with a half life of 8.04 days is far more radioactive [by a factor of 1440] than cesium 137 with a half life of 33 years, (33*365*131/(8*137) =1440) The good news is that in 80 days, 99.9% of the iodine will be gone!”
Another comment from someone who works for a major nuclear energy provider:
"It’s very simple. All atoms and molecules interact chemically using their electron shells. Whether acid on zinc, chemical reactions in the body or burning wood; all these reactions start with some number atoms and the same atoms are on the other side of the reaction, no atoms are made or destroyed. Nuclear reactions occur in the nucleus and nuclear reactions can result in new, combined or different atoms. Atoms are radioactive because their NUCLEUS is unstable. For example tritium is a Hydrogen atom with an extra neutron in the nucleus. Tritium decays by ejecting a beta particle (a high speed electron) from one neutron converting the atom into Helium. Therefore, the idea that “oranges and avocados eaten together help neutralize radiation” is pure fantasy because these chemicals can have no effect on radiation emitted from the nucleus of other atoms."
I am living proof that that conclusion is untrue and the fantasy is that chemists have everything understood, categorized and under control. If they did, we would not have suffered Three-mile Island, Chernobyl or Fukushima aftermaths. The variables from person to person or animal to animal are extraordinary, so much so that no one can erect a chart for it as they do their elements and minerals. I reiterate, chemists are trained with blindfolds, biases and prejudices that do not allow for practical and rational variations. The idea that chemical reactions are fixed and controllable is the big fantasy of those postulating and profiting from nuclear, chemical, food, fabricated products and pharma/medical and all related industries.
Since I was the victim of cancers caused by radiation treatments and worked with at least a hundred who also suffered radiation treatments and found that eating oranges and avocados together lessened the symptoms of radiation-poisoning time after time, especially nausea and burn, I had to conclude that it helped remove radiation from the body. It is true that it may have only ameliorated the symptoms however, when taken regularly, radiation symptoms eased dramatically.
Since I experienced those high doses of injected iodine immediately preceding radiation treatments 43 years ago and still have occasions, averaging once yearly, of intense radiation nausea and iodine-taste, I must conclude that the radioactively charged iodine has a much longer life than physics books explain. Every time I go through it, I experience the very pain I had for 2 years following the treatments. My latest episode lasted only 36 hours but was as painful as 42-43 years ago. Each time I have an episode, the episode duration reduces. When I vomited during those spells, tests of the vomit showed high doses of iodine (non-decayed), as well as barium as recently as 6 years ago. Since, it was always the same, I stopped having my vomit tested. Atomic charts are not accurate when biochemistry is involved and may not be when biochemistry is not involved.
A nuclear physicist told me that in animals' the HALF-LIFE of a nuclear-charged isotope can have many times more years than normal. She is purported to be expert on bio-nuclear physics. She gave a half life of radioactively charged iodine up to 25,000 years in cases of entombed animals. I know nothing about nuclear physics and have never been in a nuclear laboratory.
I think that the half-life measure is not so intelligent but that may be a lack in my intelligence. Why not just give the total years? Is it because the last half-life is much longer than the first half-life, five times longer? Is that a physicist's way of making the life of radioactive isotopes seem less threatening or harmful? And rarely is there any mention of decayed isotopes’ byproducts and how lethal or disease-producing they are.See More
I think that the half-life measure is not so intelligent but that may be a lack in my intelligence. Why not just give the total years? Is it because the last half-life is much longer than the first half-life, five times longer? Is that a ph...ysicist's way of making the life of radioactive isotopes seem less threatening or harmful? And rarely is there any mention of decayed isotopes’ byproducts and how lethal or disease-producing they are.
Four years ago, I was conducting private consults in a USA city. My first day was filled with people who had been successful on my diet for 2-6 years. Eight of them showed high levels of supplemental iodine stored in their bodies in various areas that had not been there in previous years. Also, mostly the iodine was not stored in the thyroid but intestines and nervous systems. On the second day, the first 3 clients were also longterm Primal Dieters. They too had large amounts of supplemental iodine stored in their bodies, only one had it in her thyroid.
Finally, I asked if there was a iodine-manufacturer near who had an accident. His response was, "Frank used his pendulum with all of us and suggested that we take his liquid iodine supplement that would vastly improve our health." Was taking dosages that were way beyond their bodies' capability to utilize common sense? Was trusting a pendulum a smart practice? To the point, of the 11 people who were taking supplemental iodine, only one had indications that it stored in her thyroid.
Who has proved in test after test that bodies tend to store it in the thyroid? Could it be utter nonsense produced by manufacturers of iodine who jump on the radiation bandwagon for profit, and politicians who want to give people some kind of false sense of security? The only tests I have read were done or paid for by the nuclear industry who has nothing but vested interest in nuclear industry." UNKNOWN AUTHOR...
https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.usher1?ref=tn_tnmn#!/notes/kimberly-usher/first-rate-info-on-radiation/193983407312034
No comments:
Post a Comment